W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Functions and Operators - 5.2 INF

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:38:36 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB03DA7475@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

The note below that text was supposed to cover that situation.  I've
expanded it to do so.

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:52 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: Functions and Operators - 5.2 INF





[Re-send of a post which didn't seem to make the list.]

In the numbered points following Issue 177 I have a question about the 
results stated.

If we have op:numeric-subtract(1,INF) is the result really INF? cf
numbered 
point 2.

Andrew Watt
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 18:39:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:43 UTC