W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Functions and Operators - 2.

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:29:47 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB03DA7473@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <Svgdeveloper@aol.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

I've made the change for consistency's sake but I'm not convinced that
it's the best choice of word.  Need to discuss. 

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com [mailto:Svgdeveloper@aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:57 AM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: Functions and Operators - 2.





[Re-send of a post which didn't seem to make it to the list.]

There is a minor terminology inconsistency between 2.2 of Functions and 
Operators and the referenced section of Data Model.

The latter uses "expanded-QName" (with a hyphen) whereas Functions and 
Operators uses no hyphen.

I suggest this be made consistent in those places and elsewhere across
the 
working drafts.

Andrew Watt
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 18:30:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:43 UTC