W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Functions and Operators 3 - Inconsistency?

From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:47:37 +0200
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E621060453DCB6@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, Michael.Kay@softwareag.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org

Intriguing.

Isn't your use of "element" a significant departure from that in XML 1.0?

Andrew Watt  
 
 
I don't find it problematic. XML 1.0 is interested in the syntactic
representation of an element using angle brackets, we are interested in a
different representation of the element using a node on a tree. But it's the
same element.
 
Michael Kay

Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 13:47:44 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kay, Michael: "RE: XSLT 2.0 16.3.2"
Previous message: Svgdeveloper@aol.com: "XSLT 2.0 - 2.3 [ERR004] Typo"
Maybe in reply to: Svgdeveloper@aol.com: "Functions and Operators 3 - Inconsistency?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:43 UTC