W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Functions and Operators 3 - Inconsistency?

From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:28:34 +0200
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E621060453DCAF@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org

> In the penultimate line of ordinary text in 3 an "element" is 
> given as an 
> example of an "item".
> 
> However, the definition of an "item" in XQuery 1.0 is an 
> atomic value or a 
> node.
> 
> Is there a need for editing here or an inconsistency in 
> definitions? Was an 
> "element node" intended in 3?
> 

I think the terms "element" and "element node" are synonymous. An element is
a node.

Michael Kay
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 11:28:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:43 UTC