- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 06:18:00 -0800
- To: "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>, "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@walmsley.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
OK. Will do!
All the best, Ashok
-----Original Message-----
From: Kay, Michael [mailto:Michael.Kay@softwareag.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 6:01 AM
To: Priscilla Walmsley; public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: F&O comments on substring
>
>
> A comment on the substring function:
>
> I think the 3rd example is incorrect. -INF + 3 is still
> -INF, so wouldn't it return ""?
>
> Thanks,
> Priscilla
>
yes, you are right.
There is another error here as well: -INF is not a representation of
minus
infinity. It should be written
fn:double("-INF")
or
-1 div 0
(Ashok, why not simply revert to the XPath 1.0 examples?)
I've just been checking the formula, which is written as:
fn:round($startingLoc) <= $p < fn:round($startingLoc +
fn:round($length))
whereas XPath 1.0 uses the simpler:
fn:round($startingLoc) <= $p < fn:round($startingLoc) +
fn:round($length)
I think they're equivalent, but to avoid the effort of proving it, I
think
it would be better to use the latter (which is more efficient because
the
$startingLoc only needs to be rounded once).
Michael Kay
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 09:18:32 UTC