- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:14:15 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
I'm sorry that this one got overlooked in the last round. I've now raised it as XSLT issue #158. Thanks for raising it again. Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] > Sent: 18 November 2002 12:30 > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: XSLT 15th Nov: unparsed-entity-public-id > > > > > In a comment on the last draft I queried the result of this > function in the case that the entity had no PUBLIC id. In > your reply you suggested that the text should have an "issue" > and that perhaps () rather than "" should be returned. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2002Aug/0054.html I think that the text is unchanged in this draft and I don't see a specific issue in the document. I do note that the data model document http://www.w3.org/TR/query-datamodel/ does state that () is returned for both dm:unparsed-entity-public-id and dm:unparsed-entity-system-id accessors but that doesn't directly specify the user accessible functions, I believe. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Monday, 18 November 2002 15:14:27 UTC