- From: Don Chamberlin <chamberl@almaden.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 23:19:04 -0500 (EST)
- To: Svgdeveloper@aol.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 04:38:36 UTC
Andrew, In my opinion, this passage is reasonably clear as written. --Don Chamberlin ---------- original message --------- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:57:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Svgdeveloper@aol.com Message-ID: <171.15fc62ad.2ae85900@aol.com> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org Subject: XQuery 1.0 - 2.2 "Collection" The description in 2.2 of the xf:collection function is confusing, to me at least. A collection is said to be any sequence of nodes but a sequence is defined elsewhere as a collection of both nodes and atomic values. So, by that latter definition it isn't that kind of sequence at all. Also it doesn't seem helpful to define a collection by using a term which is itself defined in terms of an (ordered) collection. A similar lack of clarity/consistency seems to afflict 14.5.4 in Functions and Operators. Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2002 04:38:36 UTC