W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Data Model 3.3

From: Marton Nagy <MARTON.NAGY@saic.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 12:01:51 -0400
Message-Id: <3CEBC0EF.76B9CBFF@saic.com>
To: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com, public-qt-comments@w3.org
CC: marton.nagy@saic.com
Dear Andrew,

We plan to address your suggestions in the next version of
the document. In particular we plan to
- add a link to W3C XML Schema Part I when the PSVI is referenced
- use the term "DTD-validated"
- specify the version of the Namespace REC 
We do not plan to provide a self-contained document describing
PSVI or XML Schemas. 

Thank you for your comments!

Best regards,
Marton Nagy

> Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 09:35:02 -0400 (EDT)
> From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com
> Message-ID: <9b.274c8a75.2a0e77d9@aol.com>
> To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Data Model 3.3
> I have a number of specific suggestions to make regarding Chapter 3.3 of the 
> Data Model WD.
> 1. In the first paragraph the PSVI is referred to without a link. Either a 
> link should be provided to W3C XML Schema Part I or (probably better) a 
> self-contained document should be provided introducing PSVI in a clear, 
> manner and, if possible, avoiding newcomers to XQuery having to grapple with 
> W3C XML Schema Part I.
> 2. Reference is made to "schema-validated" documents and "DTD-valid" 
> documents. The terms should structured the same way.
> 3. When reference is made to documents not conforming to Namespaces in XML a 
> reference should be added to clarify whether version 1.0 or 1.1 is being 
> referred to. By the time XQuery 1.0 gets to REC this may be a practical 
> issue. A link should be added to whichever is relevant.
> Andrew Watt
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 11:59:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:42 UTC