W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2002

RE: xslt2 complexity

From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 03:45:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F024A75A9@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Mike Kay said:
> I agree with you that not everyone needs schemas. For most of 
> my own ad-hoc
> uses of XML (including preparation of W3C specs) I don't use 
> them myself -

I hope this group of end users of XSLT are not forgotten
in the dash to look to the future. 
Why this can't be done incrementally, adding features which are
needed now, and adding later when the demand is there in numbers
I simply don't know. 

Please be aware the WG output will be judged against its requirement.

Regards DaveP. 


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

14th June 2002 is RNIB Look Loud Day - visit http://www.lookloud.org.uk to
find out all about it.
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2002 12:00:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:42 UTC