Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? from Jonathan Robie on 2002-05-10 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from May 2002)

From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 06:33:15 -0700
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020510063155.0371afc8@ncmail.datadirect-technologies.com>

At 12:35 PM 5/10/2002 +0100, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>I do think that it's a lot easier to add features to a language than
>it is to take them away; XPath 2.0 should be *core* functionality, not
>XQuery minus node-constructors. And the other users of XPath --
>XPointers, XForms, XML Schema, should be considered as well.

I think most people seem to be agreeing with you.

Does anyone disagree?

Jonathan

Received on Friday, 10 May 2002 09:33:18 UTC