W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2002

Regarding your comment on xsl-editors

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 18:09:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <>
To: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
Cc: xsl-editors@w3.org

Thank you for your comment to xsl-editors@w3.org archived at

The XSL WG is going through the comments at this time, developing
errata and lists of items to consider for a future version of XSL.

The following is our disposition of your above comment:

Disposition: Accepted (bug in spec)

Yes the example is wrong.

Erratum, Section


in XSL stylesheet: <fo:external-graphic src="{@image}"/>


<fo:external-graphic src="'url({@image})'"/> 


fo: element and attribute tree: <fo:external-graphic src="TH0317A.jpg"/>


<fo:external-graphic src="'url(TH0317A.jpg)'"/>

>Should I be telling my students it is mandatory?

Disposition: Explanation of XSL spec


Please Reply (cc-ing xsl-editors@w3.org) if you wish to make
an objection to our resolution.

Thank you for your interest in XSL.

Paul Grosso for the XSL FO Subgroup of the XSL WG 
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 11:39:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:43 UTC