- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:12:09 +0200
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
> See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2001OctDec/0052.html > for the proposal I made. Mike replied at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2002JanMar/0036.html > that the grouping key could be a sequence and that this would > enable you to have compound grouping keys, but this doesn't > seem to have filtered through into the WD yet... There has since been another suggestion that a sequence-valued grouping key should be taken to mean that the same node should be included in more than one group (analogously to the way xsl:key works). It obviously can't have both meanings... I think there is some feeling in the WG that we have hit about the right level of functionality with xsl:for-each-group and that we don't want to complicate it any further. If there really are problems that can't be solved (as distinct from problems that are a little awkward to solve) then we will certainly look at them. Michael Kay
Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 02:12:18 UTC