- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:26:56 -0400
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-qa-dev hacking list <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Apr 7, 2008, at 07:32 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> The way the API works is to define a handler module with a subroutine >> for each sort of event, and short of making several handler modules, >> one with data subroutine and one without (and we can imagine other >> branching situations) I don't think it's possible to just say "don't >> use your data routine for data events". > > Well, if the cost of using a single handler is so high, I would > definitely recommend defining several handler modules; I expect one > can > inherit from another, and thus, there wouldn't be any code > duplication, > right? yes, indeed. Any better/simpler solution from others on the list? -- olivier
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 12:27:33 UTC