On Apr 7, 2008, at 07:32 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> The way the API works is to define a handler module with a subroutine >> for each sort of event, and short of making several handler modules, >> one with data subroutine and one without (and we can imagine other >> branching situations) I don't think it's possible to just say "don't >> use your data routine for data events". > > Well, if the cost of using a single handler is so high, I would > definitely recommend defining several handler modules; I expect one > can > inherit from another, and thus, there wouldn't be any code > duplication, > right? yes, indeed. Any better/simpler solution from others on the list? -- olivierReceived on Monday, 7 April 2008 12:27:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:54:53 UTC