- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 12:00:54 +0900
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
Hi all, I've been looking at what was keeping us from moving forward toward a new release of the markup validator, and eventually thought that although some are minor annoyances, none should be such obstacles that they stall our progress. In particular: - the fact that wmvs 0.8 depends on the cvs version of s:p:o is not extremely practical, but that can be documented, and the installation will remain feasible. So we can at least make an alpha/beta test of the new version. Bjoern, if you could list for us what you think is keeping you from release s:p:o 0.99, perhaps we could help? - the lack of some "extras" such as the outline and parse tree, is something that I had been considering "unacceptable regression", but looking at some logs, it appears that the fraction of people using these options do not make them absolute necessities. Also, considering that we will keep them as "possible enhancement", we can get around to recoding them with the new architecture, or receive a patch to that effect, or keep in mind that it would be a good feature for when we eventually have a generic checker (such as what Jean-Gui and Damien are working on) - in any case, that's not a show stopper for the validator. Given this, I propose to organize an alpha test of the HEAD version in the weeks to come. I'll be installing the latest s:p:o and opensp on the validator servers this week, and then we can perhaps use the wiki to build a changelog between 0.7.x and 0-8-alpha1 ? Thoughts, objections? -- olivier Thereaux - W3C - http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/ W3C Open Source Software: http://www.w3.org/Status
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2006 03:01:04 UTC