- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 21:45:21 +0900
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004, Terje Bless wrote: > We've discussed moving to a minimum required Perl version of 5.8.n (n >= 3), > but it occurs to me that we'd be able to derive a little cruft-reduction by > requiring Apache2 and mod_include on the web server side[0]. ... > This would of course mean we're firmly comitted to Apache as the web server, > as opposed to “anything that provides CGI”, but I wonder if this isn't the > case anyway. Has anyone actually tried running this under non-Apache servers? I don't remember hearing so. Even then, requiring apache is not equivalent to requiring apache2. As far as I can tell, the validator's being used by MacOSX, for which even the latest version comes with 1.3. And that seems to contradict the statement below: > I'm personally interested in making sure Mac OS X works well, and with > the «free publicity» the apple.com Internet Developer article gave > us it makes sense to capitalize on that. (with which I agree, BTW). -- olivier
Received on Sunday, 5 September 2004 12:45:24 UTC