- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 17:02:30 +0200
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> wrote: >Hm, possibly a stupid question, but do you know why is any "cmd.exe" >needed in the first place? I thought that when doing a system(), >exec(), open3() and friends with the arguments properly split and passed >in as a list would avoid the need for a shell/command interpreter. Or >is this different in Windows? I expect this is due to Perl emulating fork() on `doze. - -- If you believe that will stop spammers, you're sadly misled. Rusty hooks, rectally administered fuel oil enemas, and the gutting of their machines, *that* stops spammers! -- Saundo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 iQA/AwUBQHQYBKPyPrIkdfXsEQJOxwCeIhUQWnXLKoRHxsWfZOaPIB5vOXAAn3in CgOLovXNAgxT+YT+O+BzvrP7 =7aUc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 11:03:04 UTC