On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > > Nick. > > On Wednesday, Jan 22, 2003, at 08:29 Asia/Tokyo, Nick Kew wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > > > >> This sounds good. However, I've been told the current practice is to > >> use "dated space", so the xml-validator should be under > >> dev.w3.org:/sources/public/2003/xml-val(idator). > > > > OK, I've imported it into dev.w3.org:/sources/public/2003/xml-val > > I'm perpetually struggling with CVS, so I hope it's imported OK. > > Looks OK from here. :-) > > This is currently a pretty minimal import, but it's what's running > > at qa-dev.w3.org:8888 and now also at valet.webthing.com/xml-val/ > > Do you have, or need, people playing with it at this stage, other than > just the small qa-dev group? There's no guarantee of course, but we > could ask people from the XML community at W3C to test it... Watch this space. And hassle me if I go quiet on it. I certainly have issues with it. One is to improve the output: for that I need to hack in to Xerces itself to extract the info I'm looking for (unless someone has a better idea). Another is setting up the XML catalogue and lib - and that's something I'd really like help with (I could just copy stuff from Valet, but I *know* that's a homebrew and has gaps in it). Apart from that, I'd really like to see it tested properly - Eg for those of you in .jp, does it cope with CJK? And do we have a test corpus anywhere? Bjoern has been my best critic, but neither he nor I can expect to see everything. > I'm not sure. I don't remember how far we went in our discussions about > sgml-lib... Anyone? -- Nick KewReceived on Tuesday, 21 January 2003 21:52:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:54:45 UTC