- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:31:43 +0900
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
Nick. On Wednesday, Jan 22, 2003, at 08:29 Asia/Tokyo, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > >> This sounds good. However, I've been told the current practice is to >> use "dated space", so the xml-validator should be under >> dev.w3.org:/sources/public/2003/xml-val(idator). > > OK, I've imported it into dev.w3.org:/sources/public/2003/xml-val > I'm perpetually struggling with CVS, so I hope it's imported OK. Looks OK from here. > This is currently a pretty minimal import, but it's what's running > at qa-dev.w3.org:8888 and now also at valet.webthing.com/xml-val/ Do you have, or need, people playing with it at this stage, other than just the small qa-dev group? There's no guarantee of course, but we could ask people from the XML community at W3C to test it... > At valet, I have an XML catalogue I constructed myself. For W3, > I want to investigate the XML components of our SGMLIB package, > and feed it to the validator. This remains subject to round tuits, > and if anyone's actually installed something on qa-dev, it'll save > a lot of work if you let me know so I can just configure xml-val > to use it. I'm not sure. I don't remember how far we went in our discussions about sgml-lib... -- Olivier
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2003 21:31:41 UTC