- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:21:35 +0900
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
Hi, Reading the thread(s) about the latest cvs commits, I was thinking it would be much better if people answering cvs commit messages on this list could amend the subject to say what actually the message is about (or we could have made the validator-cvs list archived and not created this list...) On a general basis I'd also suggest that we tag messages specific to one of the tools in the subject, e.g [HTMLvalidator] Why did you split this subroutine? I don't really care whether the tags are consistent (to me, [HTML] and [check] and [HTMLvalidator] would mean the same thing), I just would like to make archives readable and easy to search... Thanks. -- Olivier
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2002 03:21:41 UTC