- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:20:19 +0900
- To: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
On Saturday, Nov 9, 2002, at 20:33 Asia/Tokyo, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 09:24, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > >> The logvalidator is (unfortunately, libwww is a pain sometimes...) not >> so easy to install, > > Hmm, what do you mean? "perl -MCPAN -e shell", "install LWP" or use > ppm > with ActivePerl or use the pre-packaged version from an OS vendor? Interesting. Being a "download, make, make install" person, I confess my ignorance about CPAN semi-automated mechanisms. Really interesting, I should look at this and update the doc. I also plan to make it CPAN package (I believe it's CPAN compliant, or almost, already), especially if it helps installation. > Sounds kind of neat, but I wouldn't feel comfortable uploading my > server's logs to a public service. Yes, I understand this. I've been thinking about it, and even though there would be a few "tricks" to make it look safe (upload via https, clear statement of our policy, etc), it doesn't look *quite* right. >> (or maybe I should package libwww and all necessary libs with the >> logvalidator library...) > > Brr... I meant "make available in the same repository", not in the same package :) But that may be pointless anyway. >> Thoughts? Worth working on? > Why not, especially because of the "recursive validator" idea. Given the answers (thanks!), I probably should rather work on the install documentation and help on a recursive validator. Thanks. -- Olivier Thereaux - W3C - QA : http://www.w3.org/QA/ http://www.w3.org/People/olivier | http://yoda.zoy.org
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 03:20:29 UTC