- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:44:19 -0500
- To: "Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile" <charles.nevile@consensys.net>, public-pwe@w3.org
+1 to most everything Chaals said. We need to beef up the attention to chairs in this overall effort. On 12/16/2019 4:50 PM, Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile wrote: > In the minutes, the people who were at the meeting felt it was > unlikely chairs would unliaterally redact harmful comments or block > someone on a mailing list. In my experience I have both done, and seen > other chairs do that - fortunately not frequently, but more than once. > I think it is worth anticipating the possibility, and being clear that > we invest chairs with the authority to do so in cases where it is > necessary. > > Note that behaviour of chairs is subject to claims that it contravenes > the code, so this is not "carte blanche" for chairs to become to > become petty dictators, and such authority should be exercised with > thoughtfulness and restraint. > > FWIW We should be far more proactive in talking to chairs about this. > I never learned to do this in chair training, but I have often been > backed up by other chairs and group members (including people in this > CG), and unsurprisingly have also backed off and apologised for > overstepping the boundaries of reasonable and proportional. I have > likewise found myself in the position of feeling that a co-chair has > overstepped, and imposed an unduly harsh restriction. With no apparent > guidance resolving these situations is one of the most challenging > aspects of chairing, and one where I really felt more help from W3C is > important. > > cheers >
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2019 00:44:22 UTC