- From: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <charles.nevile@consensys.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:50:56 +0100
- To: public-pwe@w3.org
In the minutes, the people who were at the meeting felt it was unlikely chairs would unliaterally redact harmful comments or block someone on a mailing list. In my experience I have both done, and seen other chairs do that - fortunately not frequently, but more than once. I think it is worth anticipating the possibility, and being clear that we invest chairs with the authority to do so in cases where it is necessary. Note that behaviour of chairs is subject to claims that it contravenes the code, so this is not "carte blanche" for chairs to become to become petty dictators, and such authority should be exercised with thoughtfulness and restraint. FWIW We should be far more proactive in talking to chairs about this. I never learned to do this in chair training, but I have often been backed up by other chairs and group members (including people in this CG), and unsurprisingly have also backed off and apologised for overstepping the boundaries of reasonable and proportional. I have likewise found myself in the position of feeling that a co-chair has overstepped, and imposed an unduly harsh restriction. With no apparent guidance resolving these situations is one of the most challenging aspects of chairing, and one where I really felt more help from W3C is important. cheers -- Charles "chaals" Nevile PegaSys Standards Architect, ConsenSys
Received on Monday, 16 December 2019 21:51:01 UTC