- From: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:53:21 +0100
- To: chaals@yandex-team.ru
- Cc: "W3C Positive Work Environment comments" <public-pwe@w3.org>
Hi chaals, On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:32:09 +0100, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > Hi Coralie, > > 26.11.2014, 19:55, "Coralie Mercier" <coralie@w3.org>: >> On Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:12:11 +0100, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: >>> in the Procedures, the first sentence points out that the CEPC does >>> not >>> override normal legal mechanisms. It would be a good idea to place the >>> same notice somewhere near the very beginning of the CEPC itself. > ... >> I looked at w3process issue-146 >> <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/146> and what >> contributes to closing it is this (member-only) message: >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2014OctDec/0176.html >> >> ... which stresses out: >> >> [[ The [Procedures] document says "Ombuds will operate by procedures >> appropriate to their sites and jurisdictions." That sets a clear >> expectation that we have the flexibility to align with local >> requirements >> ]] >> >> With regard to your suggestion to place the same notice somewhere near >> the >> very beginning of the CEPC [1], Daniel Dardailler and I are of the >> opinion >> that it would not be appropriate nor necessary, given that the code of >> conduct is a manifesto, and that it points to the procedures, a click >> away. > > Being a click away means being invisible to people who have just read > the manifesto - or e.g. printed it on the back of some material, and > like the privacy policy, terms and conditions, copyright rules, and > other stuff that people don't read as a rule. My point remains that it should not be necessary in the manifesto to bring up the ombuds --a device pertaining to the resolution procedures. > I think it is actually important to note that the Code *complements* > rather than replaces normal legal remedies, within the manifesto > document text. However, this friendly amendment makes sense to me. I would not object. The final wording matters; "this code complements normal legal remedies" or something similar would work for me. "this code complements rather than replaces normal legal remedies" might work for me as long as I understand the need for the additional phrase. Thanks! Coralie > cheers > > Chaals -- Coralie Mercier - W3C Communications Team - http://www.w3.org mailto:coralie@w3.org +336 4322 0001 http://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
Received on Thursday, 27 November 2014 10:53:35 UTC