Re: TPAC

Evan,

You know all the arcanes of writing protocol stuff much better than I do.
Feel free to add what you think is necessary but not scary to new comers.
If it was just me, I'd write something as "Previous implementation of the
PubSubHubbub protocol do exist, if you plan on implementing this version of
the protocol, please consider also reviewing the previous versions so that
your implementation is compatible with these".

Ju



On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Evan Prodromou <evan@status.net> wrote:

>  I think the big thing we need to make sure of is that we don't put in
> requirements that make supporting 0.3 subscribers and hubs impossible.
>
> I'd really like to see 0.3 features like Atom and RSS diffs, sync
> subscription, publisher-to-hub communication, and so forth *deprecated*instead of
> *removed*.
>
> I should be able to read the 0.4 spec and understand that that stuff
> exists and know how to handle it.
>
> I realize that that means a more complex spec, but I think that's a
> trade-off we have to make.
>
> -Evan
>
> --
> Evan Prodromou, CEO and Founder, StatusNet Inc.
> 1124 rue Marie-Anne Est #32, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2J 2B7
> E: evan@status.net P: +1-514-554-3826
>
>