- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 06:43:26 +0100
- To: public-publishingbg@w3.org
Le 14/02/2018 à 15:47, AUDRAIN LUC a écrit : > Hi PBG, > > During the 13 Feb 2018 Publishing BG call, present members have > discussed the collaborative revision of *PBG charter*[1]. +1 for the majority of the prose in the the proposed Charter, but... -1 for the "The Publishing BG shall provide oversight and approval to publications of the EPUB 3 Community Group other than Editor's Drafts" sentence. I understand the W3C/IDPF Agreement is binding. I also understand people prefer sticking to the letter of the Agreement rather than pragmatism and a workable architecture. 0 for keeping the useless Steering Committee All in all, a +1 because this Charter is at least more conformant to W3C BG Process than the previous one. As I said earlier, I will leave the BG if it still has a handhold on the publications in the CG. I will also check if that weird CG/BG relationship is not violating W3C CG/BG Process; so be ready for that because if it does, the W3C/IDPF Agreement's provision about the BG ruling the CG is invalid... </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2018 05:43:52 UTC