Re: Objection to the EPUB 3.2 REC

Bobby,

Please don't take me wrong.  If the EPUB3.2 as of now is rubber-stamped,
I will welcome it.  I am worried about changes during the REC track
process.

Regards,
Makoto

2018年12月3日(月) 22:29 董福興 <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>:

> Makoto,
>
> Would you please list major compatibility issues between EBPAJ profile and
> EPUB 3.2 spec?
>
> As I know:
>
> - file-as in OPF is a must for EBPAJ profile.
> - -epub- prefix properties are used in default   style sheets of EBPAJ
> EPUB template.
>
> And for those who do not know EBPAJ profile, here’s English version for
> reference:
>
> http://ebpaj.jp/cmspage/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ebpaj_epub3guide_ver1.1.3-en-1.zip
>
> Bobby Tung
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> 於 2018年12月3日 下午8:54 寫道：
>
> Although I see some advantages in the EPUB 3.2 REC, I object
> to it unless it is completely guaranteed that none of the features
> of the EBPAJ profile will be dropped.
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
>
>
> --

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto