- From: 董福興 <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:29:54 +0100
- To: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 3 December 2018 13:30:18 UTC
Makoto, Would you please list major compatibility issues between EBPAJ profile and EPUB 3.2 spec? As I know: - file-as in OPF is a must for EBPAJ profile. - -epub- prefix properties are used in default style sheets of EBPAJ EPUB template. And for those who do not know EBPAJ profile, here’s English version for reference: http://ebpaj.jp/cmspage/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/ebpaj_epub3guide_ver1.1.3-en-1.zip Bobby Tung Sent from my iPhone MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> 於 2018年12月3日 下午8:54 寫道: Although I see some advantages in the EPUB 3.2 REC, I object to it unless it is completely guaranteed that none of the features of the EBPAJ profile will be dropped. Regards, Makoto
Received on Monday, 3 December 2018 13:30:18 UTC