- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:54:05 -0400
- To: Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
On 8/29/2018 8:50 AM, Avneesh Singh wrote: > "Is someone supposed to have an action relative to EPUB A11Y 1.1?" > > Hi Jeff, this topic needs discussion in PBG as well as EPUB 3 CG. > The process followed till now is that a task force puts together > recommendations and PBG and EPUB 3 CG makes decisions. > > A related topic is Rec track for EPUB 3.2 or the successor > specifications. Thanks. Please keep me posted as the discussion evolves. > > With regards > Avneesh > -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Jaffe > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 18:01 > To: MURATA Makoto ; W3C Publishing Business Group > Subject: Re: ISO/IEC standardization of EPUB 3.0.1 and EPUB A11Y 1.0 > > > > On 8/29/2018 7:04 AM, MURATA Makoto wrote: >> Dear colleagues, >> >> I am very sorry for missing the last teleconference of the PBG. >> I was sick and was thus unable to stay awake. Let me report >> the current status of the ISO/IEC standardization of EPUB 3.0.1 >> and EPUB A11Y 1.0. >> >> 1. Decisions of the PBG meeting >> >> In the PBG meeting on April 24 [1], we adopted the recommendation >> of a task force for creating ISO/IEC specifications for EPUB 3.X >> and EPUB A11Y. The recommendation is basically >> ISO/IEC standardization of EPUB 3.0.1 and EPUB Accessibility 1.0. >> >> [1] https://w3c.github.io/publ-bg/Meetings/Minutes/2018/2018-04-24-pbg >> >> 2. EPUB 3.0.1 >> >> To publish EPUB 3.0.1 as International Standards, the PBG sent two >> liaison statements. Daniel Dardailler (W3C Director of International >> Relations) does not see any problems with these liaison statements. >> >> In the first liaison statement [2], we asked SC34/JWG7 not to publish >> 3.0.1 as Technical Specifications. In the second liaison statement >> [3], we asked Korea to submit 3.0.1 as DISs by the fast-track >> procedure. >> >> I heard from Yong-Sang Cho of Korea that Korean NB submitted EPUB >> 3.0.1 via the fast-track procedure on August 6. Voting is expected to >> start soon. >> >> [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/0472.html >> [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/0539.html >> >> 3. EPUB A11Y 1.0 >> >> To publish EPUB Accessibility 1.0 as an International Standard, Japan >> prepared a draft of a new work item proposal [4]. Japan requested >> SC34/JWG7 to discuss this proposal in the upcoming SC34/JWG7 meeting >> on September 12. Japan plans to officially submit this proposal and >> start a ballot after the meeting. >> >> Daniel Dardailler confirmed that W3C has no issue with this >> transposition, although he did suggest another possibility: creating a >> W3C recommendation for EPUB A11Y first and then sending it to JTC1 via >> the PAS procedure. Members of the task force (mentioned above) think >> that his suggestion is a very useful input for the standardization >> of EPUB A11Y 1.1 (not 1.0) and beyond. > > Thanks Murata for running this down. > > Is someone supposed to have an action relative to EPUB A11Y 1.1? > >> >> [4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Aug/0537.html >> >> Regards, >> Makoto >> >
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2018 12:54:08 UTC