- From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 10:53:15 +0900
- To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Cc: Ric Wright <rkwright@geofx.com>, "laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org" <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>, Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALvn5EAF_t8s7DGBgaXXSWKfWJ0Bu=goTVVtfG4EK1bg0ZVCYg@mail.gmail.com>
Leonard, 2018-04-11 10:22 GMT+09:00 Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>: > George’s plan sounds great as the general plan for EPUB 3.2….but I don’t > see the ISO connection with it. > > > > 1 – As Makoto has pointed out in his document, you can only take W3C RECs > to ISO. CG documents can’t be “brought across” to ISO (using the liaison > channel). > Actually, see this W3C Note, which is also published as ISO/IEC 19757-11. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-model/ > 2 – ISO doesn’t do free standards. They make their $$ selling standards > (since membership is free, for the most part). So if this is an problem, > you should face that fact. > > NOTE: individual member bodies (aka countries) can, however, make > standards available to their members for a reduced price (or free!). For > example, ANSI (in the US) does this for a few standards. > A number of ISO/IEC standards are freely available. They include 19757-2 (RELAX NG), 19757-3 (Schematron), 19757-7 (NVDL), 19757-11, 29500-1/4 (OOXML), and 26300-1/3 (ODF). They are freely available since they were initially published and made freely available by other organizations. Regards, Makoto > > > Leonard > > > > *From:* Ric Wright <rkwright@geofx.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2018 3:46 PM > *To:* laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org; Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> > *Cc:* George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>; MURATA Makoto < > eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>; W3C Publishing Business Group < > public-publishingbg@w3.org> > > *Subject:* Re: George's thoughts: RE: IMPORTANT: Meeting announcement and > draft agenda for JWG7 of JTC1/SC34, TC46/SC4 and IEC/TC100 TA10, 2018-05, > Lisbon, Portugal > > > > I think that George’s plan is excellent, but shouldn’t there is an item > for extending EPUBCheck to cover 3.2? I think we all agree on this needs, > but seems like it should be part of the plan. Of course, these three items > (I.e. 3, 4 and 4b) are a LOT of work, but what of that? :-) > > > > Ric > > > > > > *From: *Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> > *Date: *Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 12:36 PM > *To: *Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> > *Cc: *George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, MURATA Makoto < > eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, W3C Publishing Business Group < > public-publishingbg@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: George's thoughts: RE: IMPORTANT: Meeting announcement and > draft agenda for JWG7 of JTC1/SC34, TC46/SC4 and IEC/TC100 TA10, 2018-05, > Lisbon, Portugal > *Resent-From: *<public-publishingbg@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:37:38 +0000 > > > > + 100 to this plan. > > Epub 3.2 will have the media cover and the Asian industry will be able to > rely on an compatible ISO standard in a correct timeframe. > > Cordialement, Laurent > > > Le 10 avr. 2018 à 19:43, Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> a écrit : > > +1 to George's plan > > --Bill K > > > *Bill Kasdorf* > *Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC* > > kasdorf.bill@gmail.com > > +1 734-904-6252 > > ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fisni.org%2Fisni%2F0000000116490786&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C0c01d2c9696d4c8583ab08d59f1c05f0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636589865068242926&sdata=YXAW545fikLqTXeZBnRlDSLgNmdLKCa9T%2F3TJHja%2BfM%3D&reserved=0> > ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786 > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Forcid.org%2F0000-0001-7002-4786%3Flang%3Den&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C0c01d2c9696d4c8583ab08d59f1c05f0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636589865068242926&sdata=WEKjUYfYNdn9HE3s2CKZ47cV7lPxhj2RW8%2BQiRT%2BHS8%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:30 PM, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com> > wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Based onMakoto’s email below and our lengthy discussion on the call > today, I thought I would put down my thoughts: > > > > Approach > > > > 1. Move briskly forward to develop EPUB 3.2 as a W3C CG Report, i.e. > the Standard we recommend. > 2. Also update the Accessibility Spec to version 1.1 and submit as a > CG report > 3. Develop a robust test suite for EPUB 3.2 that will also help our > rec track PWG > 4. Develop Rachel’s Best practices (oops probably not called Rachael’s) > 5. Marcket the heck out of3.2 as being backward compatible as the > current Standard. > 6. In ISO get assurances that the standards will be freely available > and may also be available from W3C > 7. Ask Makoto to move forward with option 4, see below > > > > > > Option 4: International Standards for EPUB 3.0.1 (fast-track) and EPUB > A11Y 1.0 (normal process) > > list of 4 items > > • Estimated timeline: The target date is middle 2020. (The fast-track DIS > ballot for EPUB 3.0.1 requires 6 months and the comment disposition requires > > a few months. EPUB A11Y requires a CD ballot and a DIS ballot, at least.) > > • Pros: Not-so-late publication > > - No language in the EPUB 3.0.1 spec needs to be rewritten (Makoto > please confirm) > > • Cons: EPUB A11Y is required to be rewritten in the ISO/IEC style, > although it is short. > > • Cons: Might hamper the adoption of 3.2. > > > > While EPUB 3.0.1 being an ISO standard could in theory hamper 3.2 > adoption, because of the backward compatability of 3.2 with 3.01, plus > the marketing in support of 3.2, plus the best practices in 3.2, plus the > Ace supporting 3.2, , plus the new epubcheck supporting 3.2, I think we are > in good shape. > > > > That’s my thoughts and I am sure there are things missing. > > > > Best > > George > > > > *From:* eb2mmrt@gmail.com <eb2mmrt@gmail.com> *On Behalf Of *MURATA Makoto > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 10, 2018 6:09 AM > *To:* W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: IMPORTANT: Meeting announcement and draft agenda for JWG7 > of JTC1/SC34, TC46/SC4 and IEC/TC100 TA10, 2018-05, Lisbon, Portugal > > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > On May 16, SC34/JWG7 will have a comment > > resolution meting for the Proposed Draft Techical > > Specifications Ballot of EPUB 3.0.1 (PDTS 30135 -1 > > to 6). We have to choose either Option 4 or 5 before > > this meeting. We can take more time for Options 1, 2, > > and 3. > > > > Regards, > > Makoto > > > > 2018-03-27 18:58 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > This meeting is mainly for the comment disposition of ISO/IEC PDTS > > 30135-1/66 (EPUB 3.0.1) and that of ISO/IEC PDTS 22424-1/2 (EPUB3 > > preservation). > > > > The meeting announcement and draft agenda are available at: > > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Mar/0384.html > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FMember%2Fw3c-archive%2F2018Mar%2F0384.html&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C0c01d2c9696d4c8583ab08d59f1c05f0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636589865068242926&sdata=cwrWsOMH%2FU3qrzbT6JwAIyLjJ0Pd0NWKbcyxmTxP2u4%3D&reserved=0> > > > > Referenced documents are also available at: > > > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Mar/ > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FMember%2Fw3c-archive%2F2018Mar%2F&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C0c01d2c9696d4c8583ab08d59f1c05f0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636589865068242926&sdata=PVjxuwGigX5fMl43a4sqsqXayun7krU07eiX7SdHRFE%3D&reserved=0> > > > > These documents are not available to the public. I believe > > that TPI members have access to these documents. > > > > I am sure that this meeting will care the input from W3C > > very seriously. After the last meeting, I created a list > > of possible options for the standardization of EPUB > > 3.0.1/3.2. Is it possible to reach consensus on the > > choice of several options, available at: > > > > https://github.com/w3c/publ-a11y/wiki/Five-options-for-creating-ISO-IEC- > specifications > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fpubl-a11y%2Fwiki%2FFive-options-for-creating-ISO-IEC-specifications&data=02%7C01%7Clrosenth%40adobe.com%7C0c01d2c9696d4c8583ab08d59f1c05f0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C1%7C636589865068242926&sdata=qiq%2Fvz5Dj%2BsGxtR895YrANij4%2B5PLEa1DUtJfSESYBg%3D&reserved=0> > > > > ? > > > > > > Regards, > > MURATA Makoto (liaison from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 to W3C) > > > > > > > -- > > > Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake > > Makoto > > > > -- Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake Makoto
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2018 01:53:42 UTC