- From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 12:31:20 +0900
- To: "public-publishingbg@w3.org" <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALvn5EAmQOgh_0pNQdK+5ZXuS-GX8VmEekCUOb-7uDdxLMpScg@mail.gmail.com>
Dear colleagues, I plan to send a sequence of e-mails about this topic. This first e-mail is about procedures. The ISO/IEC JTC1 SC34 secretariat checked the content of this e-mail. 1) ISO/IEC TS 30135 The combination of EPUB 3.0 and FXL has been published as ISO/IEC Technical Specification 30135-1 to -7. They were submitted by Korea as Draft Technical Specifications using the fast-track procedure. 2) Fast-track procedure Member bodies (including Korea) are able to submit their national standards as draft international standards (DISs). Fast-tracked DISs are voted only once for acceptance as International Standards. It is not impossible for Korea to adopt EPUB 3.0.1 or 3.1 as national standards and then submit it as a Draft International Standards. Member bodies were allowed to submit Draft Technical Specifications, but they are no longer allowed to so due to recent changes to ISO/IEC directives. Thus, Korea cannot submit EPUB 3.0.1 or 3.1 as Draft Technical Specifications. 3) PAS procedure PAS submitters (including W3C) are able to submit recommendations as draft international standards (DISs). PAS-submitted DISs are voted only once for acceptance as International Standards. No existing versions of EPUB are W3C recommendations. Thus, W3C is not allowed to submit EPUB3 as draft international standards. There has been no PAS process for draft technical specifications. Thus, W3C is not allowed to submit EPUB3 as draft technical specifications. 4) Normal procedure It is possible to use the normal process for revising ISO/IEC 30135 in sync with EPUB 3.0.1 or 3.1. ODF 1.1 (OASIS standard) was standardized in ISO/IEC SC34/WG6 in this manner. Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0 (W3C Working Group Note) was also standardized in ISO/IEC SC34/WG1 in this manner. Although the normal procedure requires more than one ballot, it is not so slow as long as no oppositions are supported by other member bodies. https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-xml-model-20110811/ What is more, SC34 has already made a resolution for using the normal procedure for revising ISO/IEC TS 30135. Resolution 9: Revision of ISO/IEC TS 30135: 2014, Information technology -- Digital publishing -- EPUB3 (all parts) SC 34 creates sub-projects for a revision of TS 30135 (all parts) and assigns them to JWG 7 for development. The revision is to address the latest EPUB3 revision (3.0.1), in which parts 2 and 7 are merged. SC 34 instructs its Secretariat to take the necessary action to obtain JTC 1 endorsement in accordance with JTC 1 Supplement 2.1.5.4. 5) Superseding No matter which process is used for standardizing EPUB 3.0.1 or 3.1 in ISO/IEC, the current version, ISO/IEC 30135:2014 (EPUB 3.0 and FXL), will disappear from the ISO/IEC catalog. It is not completely impossible to have more than one editions in the ISO/IEC catalog. In fact, ODF 1.0 (including 1.1) and 1.2 are both in the catalog as ISO/IEC 26300:2006 and ISO/IEC 26300:2015. But this is a special case. In the case of OOXML (ISO/IEC 29500), only the latest edition is in the catalog. Since EPUB 3.0 is an ISO/IEC Technical Specification rather than an International Standard, I think that there are slim chances. Regards, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/WG4 Convenor Head of Delegation of the Japanese SC34 mirror Makoto
Received on Monday, 8 May 2017 03:31:55 UTC