W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishingbg@w3.org > April 2017

Re: Comment on "Call for Review: Publishing Working Group Charter"

From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:54:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CADExNBPKGeztX2+M8-+Q9mm29v15Tt8hWuk+=Vx00ah9pw+7XQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>, W3C Digital Publishing IG <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
+1

Well, if we can't do "Ruminations on", I like "Deliberations on".  :-)

Best,
   Garth

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> I would propose three things.
>
> - The IG is winding down anyway, and I do not think it would work on its
> document in the upcoming time. I would propose that IG publish these
> documents as IG Notes as soon as possible (which will mean after the AC
> meeting when the publishing moratorium is over).
> - To avoid any further misunderstandings I would prefer the IG
> change/modify the title of the documents rather than change the charter. "Ruminations
> on Web Publications" sounds sexy, but I am not sure it is appropriate for a
> W3C /TR document.
> - Add some texts on the fact that the WG has the possibility to change the
> names if it wishes to do so.
>
>
> As for 'ruminations'…
>
> - "Technical reflections on Web Publications"
> - "Contemplating Web Publications"
> - "Deliberations on Web Publications"
>
> The input of a native Anglo-Saxon may be helpful here…
>
> Ivan
>
>
> On 19 Apr 2017, at 15:35, Garth Conboy <garth@google.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, got it.
>
> I'll leave our Charter Master Extraordinaire, Ivan, to propose any
> clarifying language.  :-)
>
> Best,
>    Garth
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Daniel Glazman <
> daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
>
>> Le 19/04/2017 à 14:52, Garth Conboy a écrit :
>>
>> > We could, as you suggest in your other mail, decide to find another name
>> > for the input document or deliverables but we all know that such
>> > discussion could lead to a long bike-shedding match -- I fear that.
>> > Instead, if necessary, we can add to the charter something making it
>> > clear that the WG has the possibility (as all WG-s have by default) to
>> > change the terms used in the deliverables and/or completely ignore the
>> > input documents, if that makes things clearer.
>>
>> I have no religion here. Only thing I know if that even a geeky reader
>> like myself found "Web Publications" and "Web Publications" on one hand,
>> "Portable Web Publications" and "Portable Web Publications" on the
>> other, rather confusing. Your reading of the prose, where documents
>> are different and WG ones are not supposed to be the REC track of the
>> IG ones, was 100% unclear to me. If it was unclear to me, it's probably
>> unclear to some others too...
>>
>> </Daniel>
>>
>>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153 <+31%206%2041044153>
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:56:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 April 2017 13:56:23 UTC