Re: EPUB on Wikipedia

Hi Ivan-

Thanks for pointing this out.

Yes, it is definitely in our best interests to ensure that this page is accurate and up-to-date.

Let’s all make a point of taking a look and perhaps someone can draft an edited version to share.

Liisa

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Friday, January 15, 2021 at 12:59 AM
To: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Subject: EPUB on Wikipedia
Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Friday, January 15, 2021 at 12:59 AM

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Penguin Random House. Please be extra cautious when opening file attachments or clicking on links.


Out of curiosity, I looked at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPUB<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPUB>

Originally, my intention is to add a note on the EPUB 3.3 work. However I realized that the page may need a more thorough review; at the moment, the page is still very EPUB 2 oriented, anything EPUB 3 looks like some sort of an afterthought. This may not be a good thing.

Should we care? Should we put time/energy of reviewing it? Or should we (I or anybody else) just put a line into the text on the fact that the work on 3.3 is ongoing?

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/<http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704<https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>