Re: meeting record: 2020-12-11 PubSC

Thanks Avneesh.  This clarification is incorporated now.

I also added a '?' at the end of Ivan's subsequent comment about the 
version number of epubcheck.idpf.org to note the confusion on that 
point, though I don't recall with what certainty Ivan said that.

-Ralph

On 2020-12-12 12:32 AM, Avneesh Singh wrote:
> Thanks Ralph,
> 
> It would be good to clarify which bank I was talking about. Sorry I was 
> not so explicit in my statement.
> existing:
> … the next payment for december is already in the bank
> 
> correct:
> … the amount required for december payment is already in the bank, so 
> there would be no problem in releasing december payment to DAISY, when I 
> send the formal progress report.
> 
> 
> And I checked my records for EPUBCheck version used by 
> validator.idpf.org. It was updated to EPUBCheck 4.1.1 in January 2019, 
> which is aligned to EPUB 3.0.1. Updating validator.idpf.org was not part 
> of EPUBCheck contract, but we did it as an contribution to the community.
> So, you can update the following also.
> Existing:
> Avneesh: it uses 4.2
> 
> Correct:
> Avneesh: it uses 4.1.1 (for EPUB 3.0.1)
> 
> Thanks
> Avneesh
> -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Swick
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 23:10
> To: W3C Publishing Steering Committee
> Subject: meeting record: 2020-12-11 PubSC
> 
> The record of today's Publishing Steering Committee meeting is
> 
>    https://www.w3.org/2020/12/11-pbgsc-minutes.html
> 
> Contents
>    1. EPUBCheck milestones
>    2. Meeting cadence for 2021
>    3. Roundtable
> 
> Thanks to Dave for scribing.

Received on Saturday, 12 December 2020 11:37:11 UTC