- From: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:57:42 -0400
- To: Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Thanks Bill. Your answer is related but not exactly to the question I intended to ask. The question here is specifically about the longdesc attribute to W3C HTML5; i.e. https://www.w3.org/TR/html-longdesc/ Other architecturally similar variants, such as a <long-desc> element, can be evidence of a still-useful concept but are less relevant to the HTML specification. And yes; this is a question about the actual use in practice. -Ralph On 2019-08-12 03:31 PM, Bill Kasdorf wrote: > I can report that the XML model that is pretty much universally used in > scholarly publishing--JATS for journals and its counterpart BITS for > books--contains longdesc in the form <long-desc>, as well as the element > <alt-text>. In my modeling work I always encourage the use of both, > with <alt-text> being used for the content of the required @alt > attribute on <img> in HTML and the content of <long-desc> for what would > currently be referred to as an extended description. What I can't report > is how much they are actually used in practice; I hope some of the > publishers or service providers in the PBG or PBGSC can comment on that. > > The best way to find out how commonly those are used would probably be > to check with the major scholarly journal hosts--Atypon (now owned by > Wiley and thus a W3C member), HighWire Press, Silverchair, and Ingenta. > The four of those host the vast majority of scholarly journal content. > Atypon has the biggest proportion of those four so I would suggest > checking with Marty Picco of Atypon as a start (mpicco@atypon.com > <mailto:mpicco@atypon.com>). > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> > Virus-free. www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link> > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:26 PM Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org > <mailto:swick@w3.org>> wrote: > > In what Publishing forum is Janina Sajka's query about current usage of > longdesc in Publishing best addressed? > > On 2019-08-12 12:21 PM, Janina Sajka wrote: > > Hi, Judy: > > > > APA has become aware that there is a proposal afoot to obsolete > > longdesc. We would likely not oppose that unless there is still > use of > > longdesc, perhaps in legacy education publications still actively in > > distribution. > > > > If there is still such use, or if Details/Summary and/or > Annotations use > > isn't sufficiently mature to completely replace longdesc, we need to > > know that from our Publishing people. > > > > It seemed this would be a useful agendum for our upcoming CC call. > > > > Best, > > > > Janina > > > > > > -- > *Bill Kasdorf* > /Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC/ > /Founding Partner, Publishing Technology Partners > <https://pubtechpartners.com/> > / > kasdorf.bill@gmail.com <mailto:kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> > +1 734-904-6252 > > ISNI:http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 > ORCiD:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786 > <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> > >
Received on Monday, 12 August 2019 19:57:45 UTC