W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publishing-sc@w3.org > October 2018

Re: IDPF, TPI, PBG members

From: AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 08:04:32 +0000
To: Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <11569D616DFDF1B7.44AFB17F-6649-4FCA-BCA8-A726C0268887@mail.outlook.com>
Hi Ralph,

128 is much less than the 388 in the list I’ve extracted from the IDPF Web site !
If you still have that file with “good standing” members, I’d rather start from it as it would more accurate and less deceptive...

Thanks
Luc

Obtenez Outlook pour iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>



On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 5:16 PM +0200, "Ralph Swick" <swick@w3.org<mailto:swick@w3.org>> wrote:




On 2018-10-01 02:21 PM, AUDRAIN LUC wrote:
> This list should be from annual membership paid.
> But I did pick it form the Web site and not from accounting�
> I don�t know who can still access to the last official members list.

Only IDPF Members "in good standing" were eligible for the W3C TPI
Member program.  "Good standing" was determined by the IDPF treasurer;
W3C understood it to be those whose IDPF member fees were not in
arrears.  There were 128 such IDPF members.  I received that list,
however as the TPI program is ending I see little relevance in reviewing
which organizations were "in good standing" with IDPF back at that time.

> Luc
>
>
> Le 01/10/2018 17:42, � Dave Cramer �  a �crit :
>
>> Do we know more about the criteria for inclusion on the IDPF members
>> list? Were these current, paid-up members at the time of the merger?
>>
>> One of them (Funkerz Publishing Research) is actually a service where
>> students who don't want to write their papers pay someone else to do
>> it :)
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:27 AM Ivan Herman  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1 Oct 2018, at 17:03, AUDRAIN LUC  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi PBG SC,
>>>
>>> Here is a collated Excel file form the 3 lists : IDPF, TPI and PBG.
>>>
>>> Sorry for my ignorance, but could someone bring me light on the
>>> differences between TPI and PBG lists ?
>>> - Some PBG members are not listed in TPI.
>>> Is it because they are W3C full members (the case of Adobe, Hachette,
>>> for instance)?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes or W3C members that joined W3C on a Business Group level.
>>>
>>> Or they registered to the PBG not through the TPI process?
>>>
>>> Also some TPI members are not in PBG.
>>> They may be in PWG, but most of the are nowhere in our Publsihnig@W3C
>>> groups�
>>>
>>>
>>> TPI members can join the PWG, so that is not a discriminating factor�
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To be discussed.
>>>
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>>> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>>> mobile: +31-641044153
>>> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 5 October 2018 08:05:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 5 October 2018 08:05:13 UTC