Re: [External] Small Group for Rec Track Proposal

I agree! Were you disagreeing with me? I think not!

On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:44 PM Johnson, Rick <Rick.Johnson@vitalsource.com>
wrote:

> Not to disagree…. Well… yeah, I guess I am going to slightly disagree!
>
>
>
> This task force needs to:
>
>    1. Be small
>    2. Be fast
>    3. Be focused
>
>
>
> Specifically on the ‘be focused’ point, we should not over burden this
> group with needing to worry about things that are well covered in the EPUB
> spec.  We need people who can contribute to making a spec a W3C
> recommendation.  In my opinion that means the necessary voices to discuss
> process, tech requirements, and business requirements.
>
>
>
> In that spirit, I agree that the named group has those things covered, but
> if they feel I can contribute, I’m happy to join.
>
>
>
> -Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, November 9, 2018 at 6:28 PM
> *To: *Liisa' <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
> *Cc: *Luc Audrain <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>,
> "Johnson, Rick" <Rick.Johnson@vitalsource.com>, "PBG Steering Committee
> (Public)" <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [External] Small Group for Rec Track Proposal
>
>
>
> I just want to clarify that my previous message was "looks good, get
> going" rather than "close the group." For example, if George would want to
> participate, we wouldn't want him to have missed the chance! He would be
> particularly valuable because of his NISO involvement, not to mention
> keeping accessibility concerns front and center.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:21 PM Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think you've got an ideal group to be effective on this. Having the
> public transparency lets others weigh in when they want to. Unless somebody
> else steps forward in response to your latest email, Liisa, I think you
> should get going with that group. It's the right size to get good
> discussion while still getting things done.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:08 PM McCloy-Kelley, Liisa <
> lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> wrote:
>
> public-publishing-bg-epubrec-tf ?
>
>
>
> Ivan
>
> Liisa
>
> Luc
>
> Garth
>
> Tzviya
>
> Dave
>
> Wendy
>
>
>
> Any other takers? You know this is going to be fun…
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
> *Date: *Friday, November 9, 2018 at 11:46 AM
> *To: *Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <
> lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
> *Cc: *Rick Johnson <rick.johnson@vitalsource.com>, W3C Publishing
> Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [External] Small Group for Rec Track Proposal
>
>
>
> Ivan,
>
> I’m ok with a temporary mailing list.
>
> If transparency is important, your second option seems more interesting.
>
> Luc
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *De :* Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
> *Envoyé :* vendredi, novembre 9, 2018 5:35 PM
> *À :* McCloy-Kelley, Liisa
> *Cc :* Rick Johnson; W3C Publishing Steering Committee
> *Objet :* Re: [External] Small Group for Rec Track Proposal
>
>
>
> Actually, also in view of the fact that the very existence of the SC is
> sometimes questioned (see the other mail of Rick[1]) I think we should
> *not* simply reuse the SC. Let us avoid unnecessary controversies. I
> should have thought of that earlier.
>
>
>
> So let me set up a separate (hopefully short lived, ie, 1-2 months…)
> mailing list. It would be open, ie, anybody can read the archives. The
> options that we have, from the top of my head:
>
>
>
> - anybody can simply subscribe by sending a simple "subscribe" mail or
> does it have to be done by me explicitly? (I would propose 'no', it should
> be an explicit request to the mailing list, and I would take care of the
> mechanics)
>
>
>
> - anybody can send a mail to the list, or only those who are already
> subscribed? (I would propose to leave it open to anyone who want to propose
> something, although that may open us up to spams in spite of the anti-spam
> measures that w3c have)
>
>
>
> I will have a call soon, you guys can have fun finding a name for the
> list; the only restriction is that it should begin by "public-", in line
> with the naming conventions we have.
>
>
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
>
> [1]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-publishing-sc/2018Nov/0007.html
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-publishing-sc%2F2018Nov%2F0007.html&data=02%7C01%7Claudrain%40hachette-livre.fr%7C47bb43a80ab94546de7f08d646614c3b%7Cf881a2c50a89483181b1c7846c49594d%7C1%7C0%7C636773781037387481&sdata=YIl7BnkldWEBrT6yoAxFuDsA1OU2EaOATlc6pKQNZDI%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> On 9 Nov 2018, at 17:23, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa <
> lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> No assumption that it would be ONLY SC members. If someone else wants to
> participate, they are welcome. I do think we need to try to keep the group
> small enough to not get loaded down. Our goal is to bring forward proposals
> that the larger BG could weigh in on. The looseness of the discussion right
> now makes it hard to move towards decisions.
>
>
>
> Ivan and I were just talking about the fact that we want this
> collaboration on proposals to happen in a W3C visible place so that there
> is transparency. We were debating whether we need another mailing list or
> if enough of the SC want to help, we could use this one.
>
>
>
> I’m responding to your other thread in a few minutes…
>
>
>
> *From: *"Johnson, Rick" <Rick.Johnson@vitalsource.com>
> *Date: *Friday, November 9, 2018 at 11:19 AM
> *To: *"McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>, W3C
> Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [External] Small Group for Rec Track Proposal
>
>
>
> Is there an assumption that only current SC members would participate?
>
>
>
> (just wondering if the wider community (WG, BG, or CG) might have someone
> we would want… and also wondering about my earlier email about the future
> of the SC itself)
>
>
>
> -Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *"McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
> *Date: *Friday, November 9, 2018 at 4:38 PM
> *To: *W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[External] Small Group for Rec Track Proposal
> *Resent-From: *<public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Friday, November 9, 2018 at 4:38 PM
>
>
>
> At the PBG meeting earlier this week, it was floated that we form a small
> group to try to put together a proposal (or maybe some choices) for how we
> might proceed with EPUB and Rec Track.
>
>
>
> Ivan, Garth, Tzviya, Liisa and Luc stepped up to work on this.
>
>
>
> Ivan pointed out that we should see if anyone else wants to help or
> whether this should be a full SC effort.
>
>
>
> I’d like to get a public email group setup if we are going to do this in a
> smaller group than the SC so that we can have visibility and get that
> discussion going and possibly a call set for next week if we think we could
> move faster by actually talking.
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
> Liisa
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
>
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FPeople%2FIvan%2F&data=02%7C01%7Claudrain%40hachette-livre.fr%7C47bb43a80ab94546de7f08d646614c3b%7Cf881a2c50a89483181b1c7846c49594d%7C1%7C0%7C636773781037397490&sdata=hegDaVquLRtah%2BbmODxnLNm0jtYv3imBp9Idpmr6E8M%3D&reserved=0>
> mobile: +31-641044153
>
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Forcid.org%2F0000-0003-0782-2704&data=02%7C01%7Claudrain%40hachette-livre.fr%7C47bb43a80ab94546de7f08d646614c3b%7Cf881a2c50a89483181b1c7846c49594d%7C1%7C0%7C636773781037397490&sdata=tCdJITm1DAtfACSst%2BJR2PqXWdpjGRR0cv7nYrdJrL8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Bill Kasdorf*
> *Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC*
>
> *Founding Partner, Publishing Technology Partners
> <https://pubtechpartners.com/>*
>
> kasdorf.bill@gmail.com
>
> +1 734-904-6252
>
> ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786
> ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786
> <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Bill Kasdorf*
> *Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC*
>
> *Founding Partner, Publishing Technology Partners
> <https://pubtechpartners.com/>*
>
> kasdorf.bill@gmail.com
>
> +1 734-904-6252
>
> ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786
> ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786
> <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>
>
>
>


-- 
*Bill Kasdorf*
*Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC*

*Founding Partner, Publishing Technology Partners
<https://pubtechpartners.com/>*
kasdorf.bill@gmail.com
+1 734-904-6252

ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786
<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>