Re: [External] Re: epubcheck review schedule

That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for clarifying.

From: "Johnson, Rick" <Rick.Johnson@vitalsource.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 3:59 PM
To: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>, "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Cc: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: epubcheck review schedule

Ric is participating in Evident Point’s proposal.

-Rick

From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:49 PM
To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
Cc: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Subject: [External] Re: epubcheck review schedule
Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:49 PM

Indeed.  Nice to have three complete ones.  Though, somewhat surprised we didn't get one from Ric Write or EDRlab.

Best,
   Garth


On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:37 PM Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>> wrote:
I saw three proposals:

1.       DAISY

2.       Suberic (Deborah Kaplan)

3.       Evident Point

Now, we could really use some help with the fundraising language. Rachel has updated the document so anyone can comment at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wp_fRMd4aM_73K_bhajIybT-AFOzW_eVC5OHuBlR5iw/edit?usp=sharing<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wp_fRMd4aM_73K_bhajIybT-AFOzW_eVC5OHuBlR5iw/edit?usp=sharing>. Please note that the wording in the document is just copied from blog posts Rachel and I wrote for other purposes. PLEASE help us write this.

Thanks

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: McCloy-Kelley, Liisa [mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com<mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 2:35 PM
To: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com<mailto:kerscher@montana.com>>; Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>; 'PBG Steering Committee (Public)' <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: epubcheck review schedule

I think this schedule looks good and you should move forward.

Did we get more than the two proposals we have all seen?

From: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com<mailto:kerscher@montana.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:31 PM
To: "'Siegman, Tzviya'" <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>, "'PBG Steering Committee (Public)'" <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: epubcheck review schedule
Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:32 PM

OK with me.

Best
George


From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 12:01 PM
To: PBG Steering Committee (Public) (public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>) <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Subject: epubcheck review schedule

Hi All,

Does this schedule for epubcheck proposals look right? We committed to selecting a proposal by 27 August. Is it okay if I contact the reviewers and pass along the proposals?

7/15/18              proposals submitted
8/15/18              reviews submitted by review team with proposal to SC
8/24/18              SC selects proposal
8/27/18              SC announces selection

Thanks,
Tzviya

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2018 20:36:10 UTC