- From: Johnson, Rick <Rick.Johnson@vitalsource.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 19:59:53 +0000
- To: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>, "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- CC: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <89CFE55A-27CF-4856-B687-743648B2EA7F@ingramcontent.com>
Ric is participating in Evident Point’s proposal. -Rick From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com> Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:49 PM To: "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com> Cc: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org> Subject: [External] Re: epubcheck review schedule Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org> Resent-Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 12:49 PM Indeed. Nice to have three complete ones. Though, somewhat surprised we didn't get one from Ric Write or EDRlab. Best, Garth On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:37 PM Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>> wrote: I saw three proposals: 1. DAISY 2. Suberic (Deborah Kaplan) 3. Evident Point Now, we could really use some help with the fundraising language. Rachel has updated the document so anyone can comment at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wp_fRMd4aM_73K_bhajIybT-AFOzW_eVC5OHuBlR5iw/edit?usp=sharing<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wp_fRMd4aM_73K_bhajIybT-AFOzW_eVC5OHuBlR5iw/edit?usp=sharing>. Please note that the wording in the document is just copied from blog posts Rachel and I wrote for other purposes. PLEASE help us write this. Thanks Tzviya Siegman Information Standards Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com> From: McCloy-Kelley, Liisa [mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com<mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 2:35 PM To: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com<mailto:kerscher@montana.com>>; Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>; 'PBG Steering Committee (Public)' <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>> Subject: Re: epubcheck review schedule I think this schedule looks good and you should move forward. Did we get more than the two proposals we have all seen? From: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com<mailto:kerscher@montana.com>> Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:31 PM To: "'Siegman, Tzviya'" <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>, "'PBG Steering Committee (Public)'" <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>> Subject: RE: epubcheck review schedule Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>> Resent-Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 2:32 PM OK with me. Best George From: Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 12:01 PM To: PBG Steering Committee (Public) (public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>) <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>> Subject: epubcheck review schedule Hi All, Does this schedule for epubcheck proposals look right? We committed to selecting a proposal by 27 August. Is it okay if I contact the reviewers and pass along the proposals? 7/15/18 proposals submitted 8/15/18 reviews submitted by review team with proposal to SC 8/24/18 SC selects proposal 8/27/18 SC announces selection Thanks, Tzviya Tzviya Siegman Information Standards Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2018 20:00:30 UTC