RE: epubcheck prospectus

Hi Luc,

It is not so simple because epubcheck was never implemented for 3.1. A thorough review of the differences between 3.0 and 3.2 is needed. Even though many of these are subtle, every MAY/MUST/SHOULD change to the spec generates a change to epubcheck. Further, the changes we made to some of the references (such as the way we call HTML) generates changes in epubcheck.

Best,
Tzviya

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: AUDRAIN LUC [mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr]
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:10 AM
To: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>; W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: epubcheck prospectus

Thank you Tzviya,

In the idea of 3.2, I hope there is a much simpler eye for epubcheck dev, that is not to implement 3.1 features, as they are « removed » in 3.2...

Luc


De : "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>>
Date : vendredi 23 février 2018 à 18:02
À : W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Objet : FW: epubcheck prospectus
Renvoyer - De : <public-publishing-sc@w3.org<mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
Renvoyer - Date : vendredi 23 février 2018 à 18:02

Sending the draft prospectus to everyone.

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>

From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 2:46 PM
To: Johnson, Rick <Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com<mailto:Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com>>
Cc: Bill McCoy (bmccoy@w3.org<mailto:bmccoy@w3.org>) <bmccoy@w3.org<mailto:bmccoy@w3.org>>
Subject: epubcheck prospectus

Romain helped me put together estimates for timing. Please let me know if you need anything further.

Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>