- From: Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:30:25 -0400
- To: Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, Karen L Myers <karen@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALhciFhcRc1H_uk9tm5m0iAxbrgUucYSh++VnkeStHaESZbkMA@mail.gmail.com>
Speaking of tomorrow's call, I just realized that it isn't in either of my calendars. Have I messed up somehow? I remember getting a whole slug of invitations and deletions from Garth last week, but somehow nothing wound up in my calendar for tomorrow. I know there was discussion of skipping tomorrow because of the London Book Fair, but actually I thought we decided to go ahead with the meeting anyhow. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 3:18 PM, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > Apologies, I was out all last week with limited access. Thanks for > progressing inc. setting an agenda for tomorrow’s call. > > > > Apologies as well if I’ve missed it, but have we laid out a concrete (even > if rough) “ask” for our hat-passing of financial support of EPUBCheck? > Karen Myers has an interested party (major aggregator/distributor of > ebooks) and for her to follow up most effectively I think she should be > armed with a number (or I guess two numbers – ideal amount for initial > contribution + soft commitment to ongoing annual support at a lesser > number). > > > > For example I thought we were thinking in terms of asking around $10K (for > top level aggregator) plus soft commitment to providing $2K per year > ongoing maintenance. But I’m not sure that I got these numbers at all > right, and as well as an “ask” maybe we could aim a bit higher, for example > asking $20K each from the largest stakeholders? (anyway if we ask $20K we > might get $10K, if we ask $10K we might get $5K). Then for the smallest > folks we think it worth asking for help, maybe we ask $5K and hope to get > $2K now, with not necessarily any even soft commitments as to future > maintenance? > > > > As far as the quid pro quo’s for contribution I hadn’t heard that either > but we have discussed: > > > > - All funds would be earmarked only for EPUBCheck development > - Funders would be acknowledged on the EPUBCheck github repo as well > as on any W3C-hosted official deployment of EPUBCheck (successor to > validator.idpf.org) > - Funders (who contribute a minimum of $10K)would get to participate > in a task force for steering development priorities > > > > Again if this is already figured out, apologies for missing it. If not I > would encourage us to get crisp even if it’s only a best guess. Then we go > try to round up some funders (and if we get a couple very quickly, that > will help us get more). > > > Thanks, > > > > --Bill > > > -- *Bill Kasdorf* *Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC* kasdorf.bill@gmail.com +1 734-904-6252 ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786 <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>
Received on Monday, 9 April 2018 19:30:51 UTC