FW: Decision for an ISO/IEC TS for EPUB Accessibility 1.1

Hi,
 
Perhaps another agenda item.
 
In addition to the message below,  Makoto writes:
SC34 has already resolved to revise ISO/IEC TS 30135 for EPUB 3.0.1 (rather than 3.1) 
last year.  EPUB 3.1 is not an option.
 
 <http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=17888925&objAction=Open> http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=17888925&objAction=Open
 
We only have to consider EPUB accessibility.
 
Regards,
Makoto
 
From: eb2mmrt@gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt@gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 9:43 PM
To: Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
Cc: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>; MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Subject: Re: Decision for an ISO/IEC TS for EPUB Accessibility 1.1
 
George and Avneesh,
 
 
May be we can make it clear, what does it mean from tasks and time allocation perspective. It may help in making decision.
 
1) Explain a new work item proposal in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34/JWG7.
 
2) Submit the NWIP proposal together with EPUB accessibility 1.0 as a 
draft.
 
3) (Assuming that the NWIP passes), Create EPUB accessibility 1.1 as a report of the EPUB 3 CG.  
 
   - The report should be publicly available.
 
   - The report is requred to follow the ISO/IEC directives.  For example. 
     use SHALL..  Do not use MUST.  More about this, see 
     http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll <http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=4230456&objAction=browse&sort=subtype> &objId=4230456&objAction=browse&sort=subtype
 
4) Explain the report in JWG7 and achieve consensus for a Proposed Draft Technical Specification 
 
5) Start a PDTS ballot
 
6) Have a comment disposition meeting for the PDTS ballot, and write a comment disposition 
    document
 
7) (Assuming that the PDTS ballot gets enough support),  send the text to Geneva for publication.
 
So, the biggest overhead for the BG/CG is 3).
 
Regards,
Makoto.