RE: Status of issues

Hi BillK I have dinner plans as well but I'm available for the next ~2 hours
in case you have anything hot you want to ping me about (just getting some
work done in the hotel room) and again late tonight. FYI I'm staying until
late Thurs.

 

Since this is a *Business* Group BTW I don't think it should be a problem if
the chairs/SC decide to use Google Docs internally and maybe even for comm
with the BG as a whole (noting this in re: the comments about simultaneous
editing. nothing against raw HTML or wikis but "horses for courses".). Up to
you all of course but IMO we can't afford to "set the bit" that you have to
completely geek out to get things done in the PBG arena.

 

--Bill

 

From: McCloy-Kelley, Liisa [mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 8:38 AM
To: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>; Rick Johnson
<rick.johnson@ingramcontent.com>; Cristina Mussinelli
<c.mussinelli@360publishing.it>; Paul Belfanti <pbelfanti@gmail.com>; Bill
McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>; W3C Publishing Steering Committee
<public-publishing-sc@w3.org>; Karen L Myers <karen@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Status of issues

 

Yes, of course it's fine to send to all for simultaneous editing. 

 

I am at the Fair this afternoon and with dinner plans. Will look tonight
before traveling tomorrow.

Liisa 

[Please forgive any textual oddities. My iOS device thinks it knows what to
say, but we haven't lived together long enough yet for it to truly end my
sentences.]


On Mar 14, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com
<mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> > wrote:

Yes, definitely. I will also send it to Ivan and Bill M to review at the
same time-okay?

 

BTW note that I will be in transit back to the US tomorrow so I most likely
won't actually be able to finalize it for submission to the whole PBG until
Friday.

 

I will actually write it right now, so I suspect you'll have it in less than
an hour.

 

--Bill K

 


Bill Kasdorf


VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage


p:

734-904-6252  m:   734-904-6252

ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786

ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786
<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> 

 

 

From: McCloy-Kelley, Liisa [mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:25 AM
To: Bill Kasdorf
Cc: Ivan Herman; Rick Johnson; Cristina Mussinelli; Paul Belfanti; Bill
McCoy; W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Karen L Myers
Subject: Re: Status of issues

 

Yes, you took that assignment and I offered to help. Will you send a draft
and I can comment/add tonight?

Liisa 

[Please forgive any textual oddities. My iOS device thinks it knows what to
say, but we haven't lived together long enough yet for it to truly end my
sentences.]


On Mar 14, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com
<mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com> > wrote:

Re Issue #27, I believe I was assigned the action item to write a separate,
short document on the importance of EPUB in the publishing ecosystem, by way
of making a case for the importance of EPUB 4, which would be referenced
from the charter but not be incorporated directly in the charter.

 

In fact I have gone back to my hotel room from the Book Fair to write that
just now. So unless somebody speaks up quickly to stop me, I will draft that
yet this afternoon UK time.

 

--Bill K

 


Bill Kasdorf


VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage


p:

734-904-6252  m:   734-904-6252

ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786

ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786
<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> 

 

 

From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:05 AM
To: Rick Johnson; Cristina Mussinelli; Paul Belfanti
Cc: Bill McCoy; W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Karen L Myers
Subject: Status of issues

 

All,

 

I have cleaned up the issues, did some changes based on yesterday's meeting.
Just to be on the same line, here is I think where we are with the issues:

 

- I have updated the draft on the title, the description of EDRLab, the
license, and I have also added liaison statements to the CG and the BG. The
corresponding issues are now closed. (Garth or somebody else: having a quick
look at the CG/BG liaison statements would be a good idea to see if what I
did is o.k.)

- I have created a separate pull request[1] on the DRM text; I am not sure
how long we should keep it open if David Baron and Tantek do not answer.

- I have also created a separate pull request[2] on the EPUb 4 relationship
issue[2]. The main proponent, ie, Glazou, has already publicly agreed, but I
called out to some other commenters. I would propose to merge and close this
one by the week-end unless there are objections among the commenters

- At this moment, here are the open issues and the assignments as far as I
know; please correct me if I am wrong or miss something:

 

            - Issue #22, liaison statement with the CSS WG: afaik, this is
an action on Dave Cramer

            - Issues #24 and #25, the editorial comments of Jonathan Rees;
afaik, this is an action on BISG to review and propose changes

            - Issues #27, motivate the need for EPUB 4: this is an action on
Bill McCoy (?) (It is not clear in the minutes)

            - Although it is not listed as an issue, I believe Liisa said
she would go through the text for editorial issues (I did add full-stops at
the end of bullet items now:-)

 

Anything I missed?

 

Cheers

 

Ivan

 

 

[1] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/30

[2] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/31


----
Ivan Herman, W3C 
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153

ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704