- From: McCloy-Kelley, Liisa <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:38:12 +0000
- To: Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Rick Johnson <rick.johnson@ingramcontent.com>, Cristina Mussinelli <c.mussinelli@360publishing.it>, Paul Belfanti <pbelfanti@gmail.com>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>, "W3C Publishing Steering Committee" <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, Karen L Myers <karen@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <53E2E4A3-2BB4-40D8-BF37-0D1DEB4F4482@penguinrandomhouse.com>
Yes, of course it's fine to send to all for simultaneous editing. I am at the Fair this afternoon and with dinner plans. Will look tonight before traveling tomorrow. Liisa [Please forgive any textual oddities. My iOS device thinks it knows what to say, but we haven't lived together long enough yet for it to truly end my sentences.] On Mar 14, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com<mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>> wrote: Yes, definitely. I will also send it to Ivan and Bill M to review at the same time—okay? BTW note that I will be in transit back to the US tomorrow so I most likely won’t actually be able to finalize it for submission to the whole PBG until Friday. I will actually write it right now, so I suspect you’ll have it in less than an hour. --Bill K Bill Kasdorf VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage p: 734-904-6252 m: 734-904-6252 ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786<http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786> ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> From: McCloy-Kelley, Liisa [mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:25 AM To: Bill Kasdorf Cc: Ivan Herman; Rick Johnson; Cristina Mussinelli; Paul Belfanti; Bill McCoy; W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Karen L Myers Subject: Re: Status of issues Yes, you took that assignment and I offered to help. Will you send a draft and I can comment/add tonight? Liisa [Please forgive any textual oddities. My iOS device thinks it knows what to say, but we haven't lived together long enough yet for it to truly end my sentences.] On Mar 14, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com<mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>> wrote: Re Issue #27, I believe I was assigned the action item to write a separate, short document on the importance of EPUB in the publishing ecosystem, by way of making a case for the importance of EPUB 4, which would be referenced from the charter but not be incorporated directly in the charter. In fact I have gone back to my hotel room from the Book Fair to write that just now. So unless somebody speaks up quickly to stop me, I will draft that yet this afternoon UK time. --Bill K Bill Kasdorf VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage p: 734-904-6252 m: 734-904-6252 ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786<http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786> ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:05 AM To: Rick Johnson; Cristina Mussinelli; Paul Belfanti Cc: Bill McCoy; W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Karen L Myers Subject: Status of issues All, I have cleaned up the issues, did some changes based on yesterday's meeting.. Just to be on the same line, here is I think where we are with the issues: - I have updated the draft on the title, the description of EDRLab, the license, and I have also added liaison statements to the CG and the BG. The corresponding issues are now closed. (Garth or somebody else: having a quick look at the CG/BG liaison statements would be a good idea to see if what I did is o.k.) - I have created a separate pull request[1] on the DRM text; I am not sure how long we should keep it open if David Baron and Tantek do not answer… - I have also created a separate pull request[2] on the EPUb 4 relationship issue[2]. The main proponent, ie, Glazou, has already publicly agreed, but I called out to some other commenters. I would propose to merge and close this one by the week-end unless there are objections among the commenters - At this moment, here are the open issues and the assignments as far as I know; please correct me if I am wrong or miss something: - Issue #22, liaison statement with the CSS WG: afaik, this is an action on Dave Cramer - Issues #24 and #25, the editorial comments of Jonathan Rees; afaik, this is an action on BISG to review and propose changes - Issues #27, motivate the need for EPUB 4: this is an action on Bill McCoy (?) (It is not clear in the minutes) - Although it is not listed as an issue, I believe Liisa said she would go through the text for editorial issues (I did add full-stops at the end of bullet items now:-) Anything I missed? Cheers Ivan [1] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/30<https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/30> [2] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/31<https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/31> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/<http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/> mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704<http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2017 16:00:17 UTC