Re: Status of issues

> On 14 Mar 2017, at 16:19, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com <mailto:bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>> wrote:
> 
> Re Issue #27, I believe I was assigned the action item to write a separate, short document on the importance of EPUB in the publishing ecosystem, by way of making a case for the importance of EPUB 4, which would be referenced from the charter but not be incorporated directly in the charter.

Yes, I was not sure whether it was you or BillM.

> 
> In fact I have gone back to my hotel room from the Book Fair to write that just now. So unless somebody speaks up quickly to stop me, I will draft that yet this afternoon UK time.

That would be great.

Ivan

> 
> --Bill K
> 
> Bill Kasdorf
> VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage
> p:
> 734-904-6252  m:   734-904-6252
> ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 <http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786>
> ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786 <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>
> 
> 
> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:05 AM
> To: Rick Johnson; Cristina Mussinelli; Paul Belfanti
> Cc: Bill McCoy; W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Karen L Myers
> Subject: Status of issues
> 
> All,
> 
> I have cleaned up the issues, did some changes based on yesterday's meeting. Just to be on the same line, here is I think where we are with the issues:
> 
> - I have updated the draft on the title, the description of EDRLab, the license, and I have also added liaison statements to the CG and the BG. The corresponding issues are now closed. (Garth or somebody else: having a quick look at the CG/BG liaison statements would be a good idea to see if what I did is o.k.)
> - I have created a separate pull request[1] on the DRM text; I am not sure how long we should keep it open if David Baron and Tantek do not answer…
> - I have also created a separate pull request[2] on the EPUb 4 relationship issue[2]. The main proponent, ie, Glazou, has already publicly agreed, but I called out to some other commenters. I would propose to merge and close this one by the week-end unless there are objections among the commenters
> - At this moment, here are the open issues and the assignments as far as I know; please correct me if I am wrong or miss something:
> 
>             - Issue #22, liaison statement with the CSS WG: afaik, this is an action on Dave Cramer
>             - Issues #24 and #25, the editorial comments of Jonathan Rees; afaik, this is an action on BISG to review and propose changes
>             - Issues #27, motivate the need for EPUB 4: this is an action on Bill McCoy (?) (It is not clear in the minutes)
>             - Although it is not listed as an issue, I believe Liisa said she would go through the text for editorial issues (I did add full-stops at the end of bullet items now:-)
> 
> Anything I missed?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/30 <https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/30>
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/31 <https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/31>
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>

----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>