RE: Status of issues

Re Issue #27, I believe I was assigned the action item to write a separate, short document on the importance of EPUB in the publishing ecosystem, by way of making a case for the importance of EPUB 4, which would be referenced from the charter but not be incorporated directly in the charter.

In fact I have gone back to my hotel room from the Book Fair to write that just now. So unless somebody speaks up quickly to stop me, I will draft that yet this afternoon UK time.

--Bill K

Bill Kasdorf

VP and Principal Consultant | Apex CoVantage

p:

734-904-6252  m:   734-904-6252

ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786

ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786<https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>


From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 9:05 AM
To: Rick Johnson; Cristina Mussinelli; Paul Belfanti
Cc: Bill McCoy; W3C Publishing Steering Committee; Karen L Myers
Subject: Status of issues

All,

I have cleaned up the issues, did some changes based on yesterday's meeting. Just to be on the same line, here is I think where we are with the issues:

- I have updated the draft on the title, the description of EDRLab, the license, and I have also added liaison statements to the CG and the BG. The corresponding issues are now closed. (Garth or somebody else: having a quick look at the CG/BG liaison statements would be a good idea to see if what I did is o.k.)
- I have created a separate pull request[1] on the DRM text; I am not sure how long we should keep it open if David Baron and Tantek do not answer…
- I have also created a separate pull request[2] on the EPUb 4 relationship issue[2]. The main proponent, ie, Glazou, has already publicly agreed, but I called out to some other commenters. I would propose to merge and close this one by the week-end unless there are objections among the commenters
- At this moment, here are the open issues and the assignments as far as I know; please correct me if I am wrong or miss something:

            - Issue #22, liaison statement with the CSS WG: afaik, this is an action on Dave Cramer
            - Issues #24 and #25, the editorial comments of Jonathan Rees; afaik, this is an action on BISG to review and propose changes
            - Issues #27, motivate the need for EPUB 4: this is an action on Bill McCoy (?) (It is not clear in the minutes)
            - Although it is not listed as an issue, I believe Liisa said she would go through the text for editorial issues (I did add full-stops at the end of bullet items now:-)

Anything I missed?

Cheers

Ivan


[1] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/30

[2] https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/pull/31


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704