W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > June 2018

Re: Minimal WPUB for a scholarly paper (of sort)

From: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:02:05 +0200
Message-Id: <E99BF863-D7E9-40F2-94BB-83F8F00FBCEB@edrlab.org>
Cc: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
To: Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>
I also found in https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-concepts <https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-concepts> another potential solution:

{
  "@context": {
     "@vocab": "http://schema.org/",
     "databaseId": null
  },
  "@id": "http://example.org/places#BrewEats",
  "@type": "Restaurant",
  "name": "Brew Eats",
  "databaseId": "23987520"
}

in 
Cordialement, 

Laurent Le Meur
EDRLab


> Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:44, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> a écrit :
> 
> Is Google so weak? Can't believe it...
> 
> L
> 
> 
>> Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:42, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com <mailto:hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> This was an option that I pointed out as well during the meeting. Given the fact that we'll need terms from bib.schema.org <http://bib.schema.org/> as well (and probably other vocabularies as well), this feels like a good approach.
>> 
>> The main issue with rolling our own context seems to be that Google wouldn't be able to properly parse and index these metadata.
> 


Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 15:02:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:27 UTC