W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > June 2018

Re: Minimal WPUB for a scholarly paper (of sort)

From: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:58:23 +0200
Message-Id: <14332DC2-5D8B-4DEC-95C9-53F0B64915CE@edrlab.org>
Cc: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
To: Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>
ok, and using multiple contexts from JSON-LD 1.1 (https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-context-usage <https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#advanced-context-usage>)?
Would Google be happy? 

L


> Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:44, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> a écrit :
> 
> Is Google so weak? Can't believe it...
> 
> L
> 
> 
>> Le 4 juin 2018 à 16:42, Hadrien Gardeur <hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com <mailto:hadrien.gardeur@feedbooks.com>> a écrit :
>> 
>> This was an option that I pointed out as well during the meeting. Given the fact that we'll need terms from bib.schema.org <http://bib.schema.org/> as well (and probably other vocabularies as well), this feels like a good approach.
>> 
>> The main issue with rolling our own context seems to be that Google wouldn't be able to properly parse and index these metadata.
> 


Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 14:59:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:27 UTC