- From: Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 20:48:59 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Schindler Wolfgang Dr." <w.schindler@pons.de>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, "Davis, Greg" <greg.davis@pearson.com>, Richard Wright <rkwright@geofx.com>, W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
> On 30 Jan 2018, at 20:33, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > > that is true. But the question is: what is the advantage of using CBOR over simply transferring the original resource data (just like the original document of the TAG proposed)? I’m not very familiar with CBOR, so please take my answer with a grain of salt, but if I understand correctly one benefit at least in that it is structured, compared to the multipart approach used in the old TAG spec? Romain.
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2018 19:49:25 UTC