> On 10 Jan 2018, at 13:01, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com <mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>> wrote: > >> They don't conflict. All metadata defined in the manifest are metadata >> about the collection, while all the elements that you've listed apply to >> a specific resource. > > So what's the progression direction if the collection says ltr and if > the specific resource says rtl and has more than one page? IMO, that > example alone clearly requires an importance order to be specified, the > directions are conflicting. The Web App Manifest answers this issue by saying that `dir` and `lang` only applies to the "directionality-capable members" of the manifest, not to the content of the resources themselves. As for other metadata like `name`, it says that the values contained in the HTML document linking to the manifest MAY be used as fallbacks, but that the manifest metadata is authoritative. My 2 cents, Romain.
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2018 13:37:58 UTC