- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 14:44:18 +0100
- To: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, "public-publ-wg@w3.org" <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Le 09/02/2018 à 13:41, Leonard Rosenthol a écrit : > Daniel - I think you hit the nail on the head there, but perhaps not in the way that you meant. > > I believe that this group - for obvious reasons - is too focused about finding a replacement for EPUB and *not* focused on building the future of publications for the web. And yes, I very strongly believe those are two completely different things. As you have said so well in other threads - let's go ahead and fix EPUB and address the concerns of *that* industry...but do that completely separately from solving what is needed to enhance the web for publications (of all types). > > I believe that it can be accomplished - even with our current charter - but it will require everyone to *want* to work in this fashion.... Hi Leonard, Thanks for your message, but I was not looking at "the future of publications for the web" here, I understood this is about "a replacement for EPUB" and I commented about that: I still don't understand where the WG is going and why. I don't understand the rationale behind the technological choices, I don't understand how the market is going to cope with that yet-another-incompatible-format, I don't understand the strategy, I don't understand the design requirements and I don't understand how the industry (besides Readium) is going to implement, release and ship what's discussed here. "Pursuing the wrong goal?". I don't think so. Speaking of "everyone to *want* to work in this fashion", I am not a member of the Working Group. I'm like Warren Buffet, I invest only in things I can understand. So go ahead but it's my right to not believe in what's currently designed here. Unrelated side note: I'm glad it's now acknowledged that "finding a replacement for EPUB" and "building the future of publications for the web" are two different things... Woah, to say the least. </Daniel>
Received on Friday, 9 February 2018 13:45:32 UTC